Hosting generously provided by
www.mv.com





Pick Your Language


Rant: Security 2.0 and Ethics 0.2 Beta
Posted 07/17/07 by Robert

UPDATE: There is a thread on the slackers forum talking about this below if you want to join in on the conversation.

FX from Phenoelit has posted an interesting rant on the ethics and hype in the security industry.

"The Web 2.0 has all the potential for the next big wave of FUD in security. First of all, it's not done yet. We are seeing new players on the Web but the general direction of developments is sketchy at best. One of the more solid observations is that the Web 2.0 is a work of composition from known technologies at a higher abstraction level than before. Most components are not reinvented but rearranged and adjusted. This leads to some of the lesser-known components and especially patterns [6] to be considered new, revolutionary developments [4].

The new Web primarily teaches us lessons we should already know. Basics like the fact that perimeter security cannot work in networked environments, since they wouldn't be networked if it did - think mesh-ups. Basics like: defence in depth is one of the few paradigms that actually have a chance to work in the wild and keep complex systems alive. But we knew that before, didn't we?"

Article Link: http://www.phenoelit.net/lablog/rants/security2.0.sl
Forum Link:http://sla.ckers.org/forum/read.php?13,13871
Link to this Story: Rant: Security 2.0 and Ethics 0.2 Beta
Link: Have a Site Suggestion, Material Request, or News? Submit it!
News RSS Feed: Web Security news RSS Feed
Discuss this article    Find Related Stories



External Links:
Copyright 2000-2007 Cgisecurity.com.
Providing Web Security news since 2000.
Information contained on this website may not be copied without explicit permission.
Best Viewed with Netscape.
Website Security Web Application Security solid state drives ebay cd players camera lens deals buy macbook air not work safe software security canon camera deals


Popular Links By Subject

Sponsored Link (Advertise)


Subscribe to CGISecurity.com



The Web Security Mailing List
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] Paper draft: Enough With Default Allow in Web Applications!
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] Nice little XSS trick
  • [WEB SECURITY] Security Vacation Guide
  • [WEB SECURITY] Lateral SQL Injection Revisited - No Special Privs Required
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] ActivePerl
  • [WEB SECURITY] cross site trace
  • [WEB SECURITY] Web Application Security Professionals Survey (July 2008)
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] cross site trace
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] cross site trace
  • Re: [WEB SECURITY] cross site trace

  • Contact us
    Post News, get linkage!

    Name

    Email or Homepage:

    Subject

    Finish the word below: deadb33f

    Body